

It’s Over
By: Brian | August 6th, 2008Well, itâs over.
Iâm referring to both my self imposed exile as well as the ridiculous, comical, drawn out farcical saga the latest Club vs. Country debate has become. Today the Court for Arbitration for Sport (CAS) put everyone out of their misery by ruling that clubs do in fact not need to release players for the Olympics, granting ultimate victory for Werder, Schalke and Barca.
And how do Klaus Allofs and Thomas Schaaf go and celebrate? A bottle of Sekt? Case of Beckâs? Pickled Herring? No, they go and let Diego play in the Olympics after all.
So who comes out of this thing smelling good? Who is to blame? Who is ready for some actual football to start?
Diego
Look, he really, really wants to play in the Olympics. There is no faulting him for a desire to win Brazilâs first Gold in history. Diego also felt that if he were to decline Dungaâs invitation this time around, it would make it extremely difficult to get called back into the team for WC qualifiers and future internationals. For a guy thatâs just now getting noticed as an option in the Brazilian side, it was a chance he felt like he couldnât take.
There was a bit of a discrepancy in the stories coming from Diego (and his father) and from the Werder front office about if they originally granted permission and if that permission was or was not revoked. But ultimately Werder said no and Diego went anyway. He effectively broke his contract and reported to Brazilâs camp without the blessing of Allofs and Schaaf. Thatâs where he was a very bad boy. Glad to see that Werder didnât take the nasty, judical approach the Andreas Muller and Schalke took versus Rafinha.
Best case scenario is a Gold for Brazil, with Diego playing a prominent role in the proceedings. He arrives back in Bremen full of confidence from his play and gratitude for the opportunity. Heâs in good shape and gets on a bus to âGladbach with Werder on six points. Worst case scenario is an injury. And us being forced to think about all of this all over again.

Werder Bremen
So whyâd they do it? Why fight the good fight against Blatter and his cronies, then effectively cave to pressure and allow Diego to stay in China after all? The argument and the subsequent appeal were founded primarily on principle rather than pragmatism. Frankly clubs are pissed and theyâre not going to take it anymore. Thereâs too many fixtures, too many tournaments, too many commitments. And when those commitments not only donât help to pay the bills, but could lead to the loss of your unquestionably most influential player, the risk is just too high. Someone was going to take a stand sometime and this was the opportunity. The ruling handed down by CAS was a victory for Werder, Schalke and Barca, but also any future clubs mystified by the shambolic and arrogant way that Blatterâs FIFA does business.
And allowing Diego to play in Beijing? A stroke of utter and complete genius. If they donât, he comes back to Bremen devastated and resentful, plays poorly, and accelerates his ultimate departure. Now? He still misses two matches, but returns in good spirits with everyoneâs relationships intact. Mostly.
Iâll take a happy, motivated Diego minus two matches over a bitter Diego on the pitch for Bielefeld and Schalke anyday.
FIFA
Should FIFA push for players to be released for the Olympics? Absolutely. Part of their job is to get the best players on the pitch under the best conditions possible and plenty of clubs were happy to oblige. The real disaster here is the unwillingness to get this issue dealt with long, long ago. The Club vs. Country debate has been around as long as there have been clubs and countries. The Olympics were awarded to Beijing years ago. They knew this situation was coming. And if they didnât then they are more short sighted and out of touch than I thought.
Why wait until days before the games begin to get this resolved? Itâs insane. What other organization or company would find that acceptable? The last few years could have consisted of a series of meetings between FIFA brass and representatives of clubs and leagues in an effort to resolve this headache. Would that have been all that difficult? Wouldnât it have been much more civilized? Am I crazy? I think the presence of all these question marks is an indication that there is still a lot to be resolved.
So, as things are now, Werder are willing to allow Diego to compete, given that the âBrazilian Football Association establishes the basic conditions for his participation in the short term.â What weâre talking about here is insurance in the event of an injury. This will essentially be the next point of epic debate in this drama â financial recoupment for a club that loses a player to injury during international duty. It wonât be settled by kickoff today, but it will be brought forward by someone sometime.
Best of luck Diego. Come back soon.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



“He arrives back in Bremen full of confidence from his play and gratitude for the opportunity.”
So your employer goes to court because he wouldn’t let you go in the first place, and you come back full of gratitude?
I think Werder and Diego maintain a very professional relationship and thus there won’t be much bad blood, but that is it IMHO.But, I’m full of gratitude to Bremen for forcing FIFA to confront their own hypocrisy. Now we’ll have proper rules next time and FIFA have to decide to what extent they can accept an Olympic football tournament competing with their FIFA World Cup brand.
Posted from
United States

-



Something like this - http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=560748&cc=4716
Blatter has vowed to ensure that come the London 2012 Olympics, ‘clubs will be obliged to release under-23 players’. The IOC President Jacques Rogge actually raised something which I think kind of made sense (quoting what he said) - ‘The solution is very easy - if FIFA would put the Olympic men’s tournament on the combined programme then it’s solved because then clubs would be under obligation to release their players.’
Posted from
Singapore

-



What can you do? Hopefully he gets back quickly to work his magic!
Posted from
United States

-



Your implication of Fifa’s mistake is right on the money. It seems to me that the decision of going to play for the country is largely up to the player and is beneficial to the club to release him. Let’s face it, not releasing will leave a frustrated and resentful player. Everybody benefits.
Fifa’s failure to allow schedules for the fixtures and leave a void of information up until a few weeks before the games is rediculous. Bremen obviously wants their player to do well and all the drama seems to come from them not wanting to be jerked around. Fair play to all parties, club and player. Fifa really screwed the pooch here.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












